Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

United States

Demonstrators flock to the Supreme Court after leak of draft decision.

WASHINGTON — Just hours after reports emerged that a majority of justices had voted to strike down Roe v. Wade and the abortion protections it enshrines, scores of protesters began to assemble outside the Supreme Court, flowing into the area well into the early morning hours on Tuesday.

The mood outside the court was a mix of anger and mourning, with some demonstrators sitting silently in front of a long line of candles, while others formed a roving circle, shouting defiant chants about the news.

The scene on early Tuesday echoed the hastily assembled late-night vigil held after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020, which even then seemed to cast doubt on the future of abortion rights.

But many who arrived at the court said the leaked document proved that a showdown over abortion rights was imminent.

Jack Lilley, a junior at American University, said he had come immediately after hearing the news, despite being in the middle of finals week.

“It is 12:30 in the morning, and unfortunately, we have to be at the Supreme Court because our government isn’t supporting and uplifting women and we have to use the time that we should be spending studying to be here,” he said.

The crowd that assembled on Tuesday was markedly younger and more vocal than the one that came to honor Justice Ginsburg.

A group of demonstrators with a megaphone shouted expletives toward Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who wrote the leaked draft opinion.

When a small group of people arrived to celebrate the apparent momentum toward limiting access to abortion, a much larger group of protesters moved to drive them away from the area outside the court.

Many who were still arriving at the court early on Tuesday expressed dismay that the court was moving away from what once appeared to be settled law.

“I’m disappointed in the Supreme Court, and I’m disappointed that we found out through a leak,” said Celina Bamper, a law student in Washington. “It just makes the trust in the court completely gone, to find out this momentous decision through a leak — it’s appalling.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You May Also Like


The EU’s climate ambition hangs in the balance in the European Parliament. This week, lawmakers in the environment committee (ENVI) will settle on their...


The court said that a federal cap on candidates using political contributions after the election to recoup personal loans made to their campaign was...


EXCLUSIVE: Decrying the nation’s crime spike, surge in illegal immigrants and lax criminal justice policies, Republican senators are calling on the Biden administration to...


PARIS — Carmaker Hopium said Monday it will appoint French Transport Minister Jean-Baptiste Djebbari to its board of directors. Djebbari, a former airline pilot...


The White House was unable to point to federal guidance last Thursday on what parents struggling to find formula should do, and recommended that...

United States

For one, the official said, the Taliban have not expressed an intention of attacking the United States, and other militant groups in Afghanistan do...


Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., is blaming leaders in her own party for enabling hate in the U.S., after a mass shooting in Buffalo, N.Y.,...


Sweden and Finland’s move to apply to join NATO is a “grave mistake” and they should have “no illusions” that Moscow will simply accept...