Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Trumps reach deal to postpone depositions in New York attorney general investigation

In the deal, which was signed off by a New York state judge, both sides agreed to an expedited briefing schedule that would conclude by March 31. The Trumps would be required to sit for depositions, if they lose the appeal, 14 days after a decision is rendered.

It is not clear how quickly the appeals court will rule. Under the lower court ruling, the former President, Donald Trump Jr., and Ivanka Trump were ordered to sit for depositions by March 10.

The Trumps have argued that if New York Attorney General Letitia James wants their testimony, she should bring them before a state grand jury investigating the Trump Organization. The Trump lawyers claimed that she is trying to end-run the grand jury process, where witnesses receive transactional immunity for their testimony in New York.

But the state judge rejected the Trumps’ arguments last month, noting they could invoke their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination during their depositions and refuse to answer questions, as Eric Trump did in 2020.

In a civil case, the jury can draw an “adverse inference” and hold it against individuals who don’t answer questions.

During a recent court hearing in the civil case, Ronald Fischetti, an attorney for Donald Trump, argued that if the former President declined to answer questions, it would be on the front pages of newspapers, which would make it harder for them to find an unbiased jury, if it came to that.

The New York district attorney’s and attorney general’s investigations are focused on the accuracy of financial statements Donald Trump provided to lenders, insurers and others.

In January, James said her office had found “significant” evidence “indicating that the Trump Organization used fraudulent or misleading asset valuations to obtain a host of economic benefits, including loans, insurance coverage, and tax deductions.” On the financial statements, she alleged, there were numerous “misleading statements and omissions.”

The burden of proof in civil investigations is lower than for criminal investigations. To bring a criminal case, prosecutors would need evidence of Trump’s state of mind and whether he intended to mislead or defraud anyone when he made statements embellishing the value of his properties.

CNN’s Paula Reid and Paul LeBlanc contributed to this report.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You May Also Like


Biden plans to observe a joint airspace control center where members of the US and South Korean militaries work alongside each other to monitor...


But what is actually happening? How is this different from the way things were handled in the past? And what could happen next? Here’s...


The 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled Friday that undated ballots should be counted in a November 2021 election for a...


Cassidy Hutchinson was subpoenaed to appear in front of the committee on Tuesday. It was her third session answering the panel’s questions. The source...


Perhaps more surprisingly as we head into the heart of the primary season, the same is true when it comes to gender. Even after...


Haaland told the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources that her agency plans to release a proposal for its next five-year plan for...


The report, dubbed by the Biden administration as the first study of firearms trafficking in more than 20 years, was issued days after a...


A first-time candidate and the most formidable of Greene’s five primary opponents, Strahan has the backing of the Republican Jewish Coalition PAC and the...