Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Trumps reach deal to postpone depositions in New York attorney general investigation

In the deal, which was signed off by a New York state judge, both sides agreed to an expedited briefing schedule that would conclude by March 31. The Trumps would be required to sit for depositions, if they lose the appeal, 14 days after a decision is rendered.

It is not clear how quickly the appeals court will rule. Under the lower court ruling, the former President, Donald Trump Jr., and Ivanka Trump were ordered to sit for depositions by March 10.

The Trumps have argued that if New York Attorney General Letitia James wants their testimony, she should bring them before a state grand jury investigating the Trump Organization. The Trump lawyers claimed that she is trying to end-run the grand jury process, where witnesses receive transactional immunity for their testimony in New York.

But the state judge rejected the Trumps’ arguments last month, noting they could invoke their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination during their depositions and refuse to answer questions, as Eric Trump did in 2020.

In a civil case, the jury can draw an “adverse inference” and hold it against individuals who don’t answer questions.

During a recent court hearing in the civil case, Ronald Fischetti, an attorney for Donald Trump, argued that if the former President declined to answer questions, it would be on the front pages of newspapers, which would make it harder for them to find an unbiased jury, if it came to that.

The New York district attorney’s and attorney general’s investigations are focused on the accuracy of financial statements Donald Trump provided to lenders, insurers and others.

In January, James said her office had found “significant” evidence “indicating that the Trump Organization used fraudulent or misleading asset valuations to obtain a host of economic benefits, including loans, insurance coverage, and tax deductions.” On the financial statements, she alleged, there were numerous “misleading statements and omissions.”

The burden of proof in civil investigations is lower than for criminal investigations. To bring a criminal case, prosecutors would need evidence of Trump’s state of mind and whether he intended to mislead or defraud anyone when he made statements embellishing the value of his properties.

CNN’s Paula Reid and Paul LeBlanc contributed to this report.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

United States

In a 62-to-37 vote, 12 Republicans joined Democrats to advance the Respect for Marriage Act, landmark legislation to provide federal protections for same-sex marriages....

United States

new video loaded: Watch Live: Biden Addresses U.N. General Assembly Recent episodes in Live Journalism TimesTalks ​ — live and video conversations between New...


On Friday, Willow’s crate was spotted being carried by a staff member from the White House residence to Marine One, the presidential helicopter that...


“As a teacher, I’ve imagined that scene in my own classroom, again and again,” said Biden during remarks at the National Parent Teachers Association’s...


Navarro is charged with contempt of Congress after failing to appear for testimony or turn over documents in the House select committee’s investigation. While...


The hearing, which had been scheduled for Wednesday but was postponed until next week, would feature former top Trump administration legal officials who stood...


Paladino, then a Buffalo school board member, was defending himself against allegations that previous comments he made were racist and said he cared about...


But there was a striking change from pre-2020 briefings: It touched on violent threats to election officials that stem from conspiracy theories about the...