The online multi-media presentation, which would include links to key video evidence, would be in addition to a traditional written report, according to a source familiar with the committee’s work.
Presenting its information in a comprehensive and engaging way will be crucial to creating a convincing argument for potential legislative changes as well as possible criminal referrals.
It’s also a recognition of how most people consume information in 2022 — and the massive amount of video evidence the committee has at its disposal.
“We don’t want it to read like a clunky committee effort,” Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin told CNN. “We want it to have an authorial voice that tells the story of what happened.”
The committee plans to hold a series of hearings as early as May.
Since last year, the committee has also been talking to people involved in the 9/11 commission for advice and guidance on how to incorporate its findings into a final report.
“The committee takes seriously its duty to make sure the historic record is as complete as possible,” said the source familiar with the committee’s work. “It is dedicated to making sure the report is accessible, with all the facts and gravity of what happened.”
Describing the type of candidate to take on the writing job, another source familiar with the decision said “the person who writes a press release isn’t necessarily the person that’s going to write the deep dive, and making sure that they can put the time and energy into it, was something that we talked about.”
The source added that Mississippi Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, who chairs the panel, first raised the idea of hiring an outside writer as early as November, and that it has remained an active conversation since.
“The last we left it was it’s something that we’re seeking, but we also have someone in house who’s taking on an expanded role to help,” the source said.
‘In the slog’
The process of winnowing down hundreds of witness testimonies and thousands of documents has spurred debate among committee members about how best to complete their work ahead of the midterm elections in the fall.
One source described the committee as being “in the slog” with committee members and staff still thrashing out the best way to communicate everything they have gathered.
The difficulty, this source says, is how to tell the story about people trying to overthrow the government without making it seem too political or polarizing.
Shadow of the Mueller report
Whoever the committee hires to help craft its narrative will face the daunting task of turning months of material into a cogent report. The committee has already interviewed nearly 750 witnesses and collected more than 84,000 documents. It’s also spent more than $2 million.
In recent months, the committee’s staff has grown to more than 40 people. A review of publicly available information reveals the staff’s expertise varies widely, and often includes a law degree from top schools, such as the University of Virginia, Georgetown, Stanford or UCLA.
Several attorneys for the committee have experience with the Department of Justice, including one who prosecuted notorious Mexican drug cartel leader Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman. Another served as an immigration attorney. Others spent time at DHS and on Capitol Hill.
“The Muller report is the example of how we don’t want it to read,” said Raskin.
Decisions still to be made
Thompson has told reporters the committee could wrap up depositions as early as April 1. He has been reluctant to put a specific timeline as to when a report will be released.
“It’s a moving target. I mean, I wish I could tell you,” Thompson told CNN. “We have some timetables, but when we get 10,000 pages of information that we need to go through, it moves.”
If the panel wraps up its depositions by April, it would likely leave a number of key Trump allies who have been subpoenaed in limbo, including Rudy Giuliani and former White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino.
Giuliani has been engaging with the committee, through his attorney, and has signaled a willingness to answer questions but no formal cooperation agreement has been reached.
While many close Trump allies have dodged the committee’s attempts to compel them to cooperate, the committee has quietly had success obtaining testimony from a handful of lesser-known White House aides and staffers who were in the West Wing on January 6.
In recent months, the committee has interviewed Nick Luna, former President Donald Trump’s body man, Cassidy Hutchinson a former aide to then-chief of staff Mark Meadows, and Ross Worthington, a White House aide and one of the writers of Trump’s speech on the ellipse on January 6.
The committee has also had success in getting some level of cooperation from some Trump campaign officials. Katrina Pierson, a prominent campaign spokesperson who was part of a West Wing meeting leading up to January 6 has met with the committee, as has Max Miller a former White House and campaign official who is now running for Congress.
Jason Miller, a long time spokesperson for Trump also met with the committee and his deposition was prominently featured in a legal brief filed by the committee designed to block Eastman’s attempts to keep secret a tranche of emails the conservative attorney claimed should be protected by attorney client privilege.
Members on the panel have also yet to make a decision on whether they want to subpoena their colleagues, such as Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, as the Republican lawmakers they have requested to hear from that hold key information have all turned down the voluntary requests.
“We’re doing multiple things at once,” committee member Rep. Pete Aguilar told CNN, referring to the multiple and simultaneous conversations that are ongoing not only about the process moving forward but the questions hanging over the investigation.
The lack of cooperation from key holdouts however, will not slow the panel’s investigation down, according to members on the committee.
“We really want to have engagement with everybody we approached. But some we’ve been able to get it and some we haven’t,” Thompson said. “We haven’t given up. It’s just that our report didn’t rise or fall on one or two individuals.”
Aguilar, a California Democrat, told CNN, “Maybe we won’t ever hear from some of them. But we’re not giving up yet. And we’re still pursuing lines that would help us get the information we need.”
But just because members believe they can complete their investigation using alternative information sources, does not mean they will stop short of holding individuals accountable, even issuing criminal contempt referrals for specific subpoena targets after the final report is released.
“I think the committee is quite serious that everybody needs to participate. So yeah, I don’t think we give anybody a free pass,” said Raskin. “You know, what, one possibility is? That we draft a report, and we wait until the end to see if we get everybody’s participation.”
There is also no firm agreement over what the structure or topic of the long-awaited series of hearings will be, even as the panel enters the time frame for when they have said they will take place.
“We’re, having those conversations now on what this looks like, timing and which topics to address first,” said Aguilar.
CNN’s Whitney Wild contributed to this report.