Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Environmentalists are blocking forest management methods saving iconic sequoias amid Yosemite wildfire

A major environmental group has continued to pursue litigation blocking the same wildfire forest management techniques that are currently helping to save a mass of iconic sequoias in California.

The Earth Island Institute, a California-based organization, filed a federal lawsuit in June asking the court to halt a “biomass removal and thinning” project proposed by Yosemite National Park and the National Park Service (NPS). The lawsuit argued the plan would benefit commercial loggers, negatively impact endangered wildlife and was unnecessary, asserting dead tree density was irrelevant to potential wildfire proliferation.


Under the proposal, the NPS had planned to cut down “hazard trees” and remove biomass like fallen dead trees that could contribute to wildfires, according to project documents. On July 5, though, Yosemite National Park agreed to halt its plans pending a court decision in the case.

Previous fuel reduction treatments, meanwhile, have helped protect historic sequoia trees in Yosemite’s Mariposa Grove amid a raging Washburn wildfire that has ripped through the park since July 7, two days after the NPS plan was halted. Firefighters have been able to contain 25% of the wildfire which has spread across 2,340 acres of the park.

“We’ve been preparing for the Washburn Fire for decades,” John Dickman, a Yosemite forest ecologist, said Tuesday. “It really just died as soon as it hit the grove.”

White House assistant press secretary Abdullah Hasan acknowledged Wednesday that efforts to protect the forest from wildfire damage “include removing hazardous fuels,” or thicket and dead trees that are contributing to the fire. In addition, a federal report on the ongoing wildfire fire stated that it is spreading through an area with a “very heavy accumulation” of fuels.

However, Earth Island Institute and other organizations have continued to push against similar NPS forest fire management techniques. Earth Island’s John Muir Project and a series of other green groups recently announced their opposition to the bipartisan Save Our Sequoias (SOS) Act introduced last month which would boost such efforts, according to its co-sponsors.


“It’s very telling that the loudest voices opposing the SOS Act are the same ones actively thwarting scientific forest management,” one of the bill’s co-sponsors House Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., told Fox News Digital. “Just last week, the John Muir Project successfully blocked a forest restoration project in Giant Sequoia groves in Yosemite, hours before the Washburn Fire started in the park.”

“All experts on the ground right now are saying the only thing preventing the Mariposa Grove from becoming a raging inferno is the active management National Park Service rangers carried out in the park,” he continued. “This confirms what we’ve known all along: if we’re fighting a fire as it spreads, we’ve already lost.”

The SOS Act — which was introduced by Westerman, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Rep. Scott Peters, D-Calif., and several other lawmakers on June 23 — would “prioritize wildfire risk reduction treatments in the highest-risk groves” and promote scientific forest management activities, according to its sponsors. 


But Chad Hanson, a research ecologist at the John Muir Project, said the NPS plan would have taken place “miles away” from where the Washburn fire is located. He also said the John Muir Project supports small “prescribed burning” plans and downplayed the current wildfire’s impact, saying “sequoias need mixed-intensity wildfire” to reproduce.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., an SOS Act co-sponsor, addresses reporters on Dec. 3, 2021.

“The Washburn fire is a relatively small, very slow moving surface fire, burning mainly at low intensity in mild to moderate fire weather, including in dense forests with no forest management history and an abundance of live and dead trees,” he told Fox News Digital.

“This underscores what John Muir Project and hundreds of scientists have been saying for years: it’s not primarily about the density of live or dead trees, it’s about the weather and climate, and climate change,” Hanson continued.

The John Muir Project tweeted Tuesday that the SOS Act “is nothing more than a Trojan horse to reduce environmental reviews,” a criticism rejected by the bill’s sponsors. A spokesperson for Westerman said a plain reading of the legislation’s text shows that it wouldn’t waive any environmental reviews or delegate them to third parties.

The NPS didn’t respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You May Also Like

United States

In the weeks after President Donald J. Trump lost the 2020 election, the Fox Business host Lou Dobbs claimed to have “tremendous evidence” that...


Washington, D.C., and New York City can handle a few busloads of migrants if small border towns could endure hundreds – or thousands –...


In a bid to do away with a name criticized for having problematic connotations, the World Health Organization (WHO) is asking the public to...

United States

SAN FRANCISCO — Nancy Pelosi has made two very different, almost irreconcilable statements about her political future. In 2018, she pledged that 2022 would...


The Idaho Supreme Court ruled Friday that strict abortion bans will be allowed to take effect.  The ruling comes as legal challenges over the...


Retired Navy Vice Admiral Mike Franken, the Democratic candidate challenging incumbent Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, in November, discussed moving his adopted “special needs girl”...


Renowned author Salman Rushdie is on a ventilator and may lose one eye as a result of the stabbing attack he suffered while delivering...

United States

Democrats in Congress have had to scale back their legislative ambitions since last year, but the Inflation Reduction Act, passed by the House on...